<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Religon and Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masstheology.com/2006/11/22/thoughts_on_religon_and_science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2006/11/22/thoughts_on_religon_and_science/</link>
	<description>Conversations in Theology and its interaction with Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: casey</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2006/11/22/thoughts_on_religon_and_science/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1096717754#comment-596</guid>
		<description>take it to the next level.  science and religion is easy to look at.  But what should (or is) the relationship between philosphy, logic, and religion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>take it to the next level.  science and religion is easy to look at.  But what should (or is) the relationship between philosphy, logic, and religion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: casey</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2006/11/22/thoughts_on_religon_and_science/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1096717754#comment-595</guid>
		<description>great post...insightful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post&#8230;insightful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HT</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2006/11/22/thoughts_on_religon_and_science/comment-page-1/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>HT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">1096717754#comment-594</guid>
		<description>What really humors me is that many atheists are saying that we need to replace religion with science.  I feel that is as foolish as abandoning science for the sake of religion.  I feel that Henry Michael is right in that sceice is not explaining why but only how.  I just wish that one of my atheist friends would realize this truth.  I do not degrade him for being an atheist, I just would realize that science can only explain so much and the religious texts only explain so much.  I think that many people on both sides of the debate would see that truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really humors me is that many atheists are saying that we need to replace religion with science.  I feel that is as foolish as abandoning science for the sake of religion.  I feel that Henry Michael is right in that sceice is not explaining why but only how.  I just wish that one of my atheist friends would realize this truth.  I do not degrade him for being an atheist, I just would realize that science can only explain so much and the religious texts only explain so much.  I think that many people on both sides of the debate would see that truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.468 seconds -->
