<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wayne on Wayne on Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/</link>
	<description>Conversations in Theology and its interaction with Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hank</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5107</guid>
		<description>I think E.I. is quite correct in his analogy of Calvinism vs. Arminianism, and Wayne on Grudem's statement. How one translates the gender of certain words to make them more inclusive or more literal to the Greek words should never call into question one's commitment to the Bible. I think Grudem goes a little over board in this issue. Gender inclusive language does not make the church unpure, neither does an egalitarian view of the roles of men and women in the body of Christ. It feels like some emotional ploy to &#34;poison the well.&#34; But I do admire the intensity of his conviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think E.I. is quite correct in his analogy of Calvinism vs. Arminianism, and Wayne on Grudem&#8217;s statement. How one translates the gender of certain words to make them more inclusive or more literal to the Greek words should never call into question one&#8217;s commitment to the Bible. I think Grudem goes a little over board in this issue. Gender inclusive language does not make the church unpure, neither does an egalitarian view of the roles of men and women in the body of Christ. It feels like some emotional ploy to &quot;poison the well.&quot; But I do admire the intensity of his conviction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5105</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5105</guid>
		<description>Shhh!!! don't say 'postmodernity' too loud!

But, yeah, I agree completely....that is with the response to Grudem and with E.I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shhh!!! don&#8217;t say &#8216;postmodernity&#8217; too loud!</p>
<p>But, yeah, I agree completely&#8230;.that is with the response to Grudem and with E.I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. I. Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>E. I. Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstheology.com/2007/11/28/wayne-on-wayne-on-gender/#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of the Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate.  Smart People.  Same Bible Verses. Different conclusions.

Perhaps there is something in post-modernity for all of us!

Edgar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate.  Smart People.  Same Bible Verses. Different conclusions.</p>
<p>Perhaps there is something in post-modernity for all of us!</p>
<p>Edgar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.668 seconds -->
