<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genesis Genealogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.masstheology.com/2009/01/06/genesis-genealogy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2009/01/06/genesis-genealogy/</link>
	<description>Conversations in Theology and its interaction with Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.masstheology.com/2009/01/06/genesis-genealogy/comment-page-1/#comment-6831</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.masstheology.com/?p=1036#comment-6831</guid>
		<description>To me, it is clear, not only from this, but from many other issues in Genesis, that these genealogies are not primarily considered to be historical accounts of the actual progeny of Seth and Cain. More, they&#039;re spiritual genealogies...but the context demonstrates that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it is clear, not only from this, but from many other issues in Genesis, that these genealogies are not primarily considered to be historical accounts of the actual progeny of Seth and Cain. More, they&#8217;re spiritual genealogies&#8230;but the context demonstrates that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.821 seconds -->
