Theology for the Masses

Conversations in Theology and its interaction with Culture

Browsing Posts tagged Good Answer

We took communion today at church. That I’ve noted it tells you how rare an occasion this actually is. For being a democratic people who put emphasis on the priesthood of every believer, we Baptists are really pretty hierarchical about who can lead the serving of the communion. As we’ve been without a pastor for a number of months now, we’ve avoided the Lord’s Supper, I think, because there hasn’t been an “official” present to direct it.

Either way, I couldn’t help but think today that the early church deemed the event life-giving and vital to their existence. Yet in my tradition we really can do with or without it. I seriously don’t think most Baptist churches would even notice if failed to take the Lord’s Supper for a full year. Why did the early church find this event so vital? What is so essential about it? – Those are genuine questions, not merely rhetorical ones.

Sometimes it is disadvantageous being Baptist. The Lord’s Supper is not a “means of grace;” it is merely an ordinance that symbolizes the death of Christ. But there are many things that symbolize Christ’s death – what makes this one so special? Surely it is, but I don’t know that my tradition has reflected enough on it to have a good answer to that question.

Furthermore, as we went though the ceremony, I wondered what my mind is supposed to dwell on while taking the elements. As I crush the bread between my teeth, am I to be thinking of the breaking body of Christ? Is it that literal? Should I be confessing sin? What does it mean to take the Supper “unworthily?”

Or what about the unity that should be symbolized at the Lord’s Supper? In Baptist churches we have individual wafers and individual cups, each symbolizing our individual spirituality. But, to me, there’s something vital to everyone taking from the same piece of bread and drinking from the same cup. We are the body of Christ partaking in the body of Christ. We destroy congregational solidarity when we individualize the communion (not to mention, we’ve just created a contradiction in terms.

But the rampant individualism doesn’t stop there. Indeed, our emphasis is on making sure that we each individually are “right before God” before we take up the cup and bread. But never have I been in a service where we talked about communal repentance before the Lord’s Supper. Our privatized prayers and individualized religion perpetuate lifelessness. The communion seems to be an opportunity to break free from this. Yet we’ve colonized this as well.

As a movement, we Baptists are probably too prideful and stubborn to ask for help. Nevertheless, I ask you for help: what should I be thinking about as I take the Lord’s Supper? Is Christ really present in the elements in some way? Does the Spirit dynamically meet with the people during the Supper? How do we conquer the individualism of this communal ceremony? I feel there is vitality there yet untapped, but to be honest, I don’t even know where to begin.

Was Jesus a rabbi? The definite answer is – Yes and No. Wayne Meeks, along with others, points out that the earliest we can trace Rabbinic Judaism is to the academy at Yavneh in the second century CE. To refer to anyone before then as a Rabbi in the big-R sense is anachronistic. [1] Now, Jesus was called rabbi to be sure, but this referred to anyone who taught and was viewed as an authority on the law – it was much more of a general term, sorta like teacher is today.

There really is no good answer as to the currents behind the formation of the Rabbinical school, and by good I mean an answer predicated by definite evidence. We have the experts in the interpretation of the Law, Pharisees, till 70 and then in 170(?) we suddenly have the Rabbis, new interpreters of the Law. It is most likely that P->R happened, but there is no concrete evidence showing that transition. This is not to say that good ole JC was not an expert in the Law, just that we should not throw all of the connotations we have of current Rabbis onto him.

I often loose sight of that distinction when I hear the term Rabbi thrown about, especially in conjunction with Jesus and Paul. I don’t think this is limited to just myself.

  1. Meeks, Wayne A. The First Urban Christians. 2nd Edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003. p. 33. []
Powered by WordPress Web Design by SRS Solutions © 2010 Theology for the Masses Design by SRS Solutions

Bad Behavior has blocked 422 access attempts in the last 7 days.